In sharing my holistic approach to lawyering with some friends I was asked why clients would be interested in "bringing a knife to a gun fight?" Good question.
First, I need to clear up the mistaken premise my friend -- and others -- have, i.e., that issues of law are resolved through gun battles. Quite the opposite, nearly every legal issue is resolved outside of the court house. However, it is no wonder that people reach this erroneous conclusion; for that, we can thank all those legal dramas from television and movies. For some, the perceived thrill comes from legal spellbinder, usually in paperback. What nearly every truthful attorney will tell you is that being a lawyer is simply not that exciting. I, myself, respond to the awed questioner asking "You're a lawyer?" with "Don't be too dazzled. It's not as thrilling as you've been lead to believe."
If "gun fights" occur so very rarely, why bother with preparing for them, either emotionally or financially? Instead of approaching an unavoidable legal event with antagonism -- say a criminal pre-trial conference or a divorce exchange of information required by mandatory discovery -- the client of the holistic attorney goes into the event peacefully and -- most certainly -- without a gun.
The client of the holistic attorney has already decided that the fight is not worth having because, in reality, a fight need not occur. The pre-trial conference and the discovery exchange are part of the process; there is no avoiding these. Why not embrace the possibility that the unavoidable can be civil? Leave the gun and the knife at home.
Comments?
What are your thoughts about this? Would you be the type of client who wants to get through your legal crisis (real or imagined) in this way? Feel free to comment below.